In
a strange twist of events, the panel regarding US policy on the Middle East
happened hours before the United States launched fifty-nine Tomahawk missiles
at a Syrian air base. Contrary to some of the panelists view, who believed the
US would leave Syria alone to focus on destroying ISIS. The differing
perspectives between the three panelists were offering not only different
viewpoints, but were experts in various fields.
After attending a similar lecture last
year regarding US policy towards Russia and the Ukraine, having a professor
from the Army War College adds quality and depth in places where civilians
sometimes cannot. However, something that I do not think was adequately addressed
was Putin’s interest in supporting the Syrian regime. Considering the proximity
to the Russian border, it makes sense that Putin would prefer to keep active US
troops out of the picture. Putin seems to want to establish a sphere of
influence where he can reestablish the former military might of the former
Soviet Union.
Another interesting angle brought up by
the panel was the dynamic between the regional powers in the Middle East, Saudi
Arabia and Iran. Both states try to exercise power over surrounding countries
with either blatant or covert action. A surprising attitude which the panelists
reflected was downplaying the threat ISIS poses, as well as how quickly they
expect it to be destroyed. I think they could have been clearer here, as the
territory ISIS has might be taken back, but the ideology itself is much more
difficult to combat. Similarly, to the missile attack, days after the panel,
ISIS claimed responsibility for a terror attack on a church in Egypt. It seems
like predicting what might happen in the Middle East is near futile.
Looking forward, US policy in the Middle
East seemingly must work with Moscow and try to avoid civilian causalities. One
of the more somber points brought forward in the panel was that the Middle East
and its assortment of problems should only be contained, not solved. While this
is certainly a realist’s opinion on the matter, it does offer a bleak future
for the region.
No comments:
Post a Comment